Foil as Antagonist: The Need for Opposing Characters in Snow White and Little Red Riding Hood

When approaching the realm of Fairy Tales, one name always comes to mind: Disney. The imaginative prowess and influence of Walt Disney Studios, arguably, allowed for a resurgence of Fairy Tale knowledge with the release of their 1934 Snow White and the Seven Dwarves. This company has done much to create and alter classic fairy tales in a way that children, along with their families, can enjoy. These stories, although generally simplistic in nature, especially compared to their complex source material, do thoroughly highlight, as Kay Stone notes, who the protagonists and antagonists are through their “cloyingly pretty and passive heroines contrast[ed] with old and ugly female schemers” (Bottigheimer, 3). Although exaggerated, Disney does, with excellence, articulate the obvious struggle present in classic fairy tales. While these power struggles are, generally, easily noticed and deciphered, one cannot help but notice the complex relationships that the antagonists and protagonists share. When analyzing Aarne-Thompson type 709 (“Snow-White”) and 333 (“Little Red Riding Hood”) fairy tales, one cannot help but notice the dual identity of the antagonist. Both the Wolf and the Wicked Step-Mother/Witch serve as both antagonist and foil to the tales’ protagonists. By evaluating and analyzing several versions and reiterations for both of the aforementioned Aarne-Thompson types, the reader notes the necessary and immovable role that these antagonists play, both as evil opponents within the overarching power struggle present in the narrative and as opposition allowing for the protagonist’s characteristics to be highlighted and celebrated.

            The “Snow-White” type holds what is perhaps the most well-known example of antagonist as foil in fairy tale and modern literature. Through the analysis of several iterations of this story type, the dual nature of the Wicked Step-Mother/Witch becomes increasingly apparent. Giambattista Basile’s “The Young Slave,” the Brothers Grimm “Snow White,” and Neil Gaiman’s “Snow, Glass, Apples” all present differing examples of the “Snow-White” type wherein the antagonist, or in Gaiman’s work, protagonist, also hold the role as Snow White’s foil. This relationship between a wicked family member and Snow White serves as the central basis of conflict for the story type and requires, so it seems, a foil relationship between the two.

            In Giambattista Basile’s “The Young Slave,” Basile, with what is one of the earliest editions, presents “Snow-White” as an orphan named Lisa. She is the byproduct of a plant’s divine insemination who is at conflict with an aunt that is “suspicious, and impelled by jealousy and consumed by curiosity” (Basile, 92). This curiosity causes the jealous aunt to rebel against her husband and sentence her niece to hard labor until she is eventually rediscovered and ascend back to a place of honor at the expense of her aunt. This formula, although much tamer in Basile than in other iterations, is wholly consistent amongst the several “Snow-White” types. Just as in other versions, Basile establishes that Lisa and her aunt are both nemeses and foils of one another. Consider the language used for describing the aunt when Basile notes that she “was as bitter as a slave, as angry as a bitch with a litter of pups, and as venomous as a snake” (93). This description is wholly juxtaposed with Lisa who is “as beautiful as a goddess” (95). In the short span of “The Young Slave,” Basile effectively creates a palpable opposition between the characters of the aunt and her niece Lisa.

Suzanne Maganini, in her article “Foils and Fakes: The Hydra in Giambattista Basile's Dragon-Slayer Tale, ‘Lo mercante,’” analyzes the diminishing role of foil that Basile establishes between Cienzo and his foe, the Hydra. Maginini asserts that although “the monster appeared to Basile’s twentieth-century English and Italian translators to be simply a foil to the hero, undeserving of any explication … the representation of this beast suggest that it plays a much more complex role in this tale” (171-172). Maganini acknowledges the complex nature present behind Cienzo and the Hydra’s foil relationship; because the Hydra, being much weaker than Hercules’, is so simple to kill, it serves as a foil representing the unimpressive nature of Cienzo as hero. In the same way, while the aunt serves as a foil and antagonist to Lisa, Basile’s “The Young Slave” lacks the extreme nature of antagonistic and foil relationship found in other editions of the “Snow-White” type. The most obvious and noticeable example of this tame and safe nature is seen in the story’s lack of murder and in how the antagonist is punished; Basile’s Baron “[drives] his wife away, sending her back to her parents,” (95) whereas other tales end with the antagonist dancing to death in red-hot iron shoes. Much like Cienzo’s Hydra, Lisa’s aunt serves as a “diminished foil [that] reflects the limits of this hero” (Maganini, 190).

Although it was written nearly two centuries after Basile’s, the Brothers Grimm “Snow White” serves as perhaps the most well-known print edition of the “Snow-White” type. It is from this story that many other, arguably more famous, interpretations are founded. These more famous interpretations, Walt Disney’s Snow White and the Seven Dwarves and Anne Sexton’s “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs,” while paramount in the solidification of the sheer wealth of the fame of “Snow-White”, are not going to be discussed in great detail, opting, instead, to analyze the foundation on which these versions are placed: Brothers Grimm “Snow White.” The Brothers’ edition of this tale, being more well-known, seems much more familiar to American audiences. Snow White is born and eventually poisoned by her wicked Step-Mother; she is resurrected and glorified; the wicked Step-Mother is punished accordingly: she must dance in red-hot iron shoes until she dies. Perhaps the last portion is less familiar to American audiences who have only experienced the Walt Disney edit, but the rest of the story serves to be identical to Disney’s. The relationship between Snow White and her Step-Mother in the Brother’s, and Disney’s, edition provide much more evidence for the Step-Mother’s strong role of antagonist and foil to Snow White. In “Snow White and Her Wicked Stepmother,” Sandra M. Gilbert and Susan Gubar highlight “the relationship between these two women: the one fair, young, pale, the other just as fair, but older, fiercer; the one a daughter, the other a mother; the one sweet, ignorant, passive, the other both artful and active; the one a sort of angel, the other an undeniable witch” (292).

They continue to notice foil parallels regarding the main conflict between the two characters; they note that “both have been locked: a magic looking glass, and an enchanting glass coffin” (292). These two mode of glass establish the undeniable conflict that these two women, character traits aside, face. The Step-Mother uses a glass tool which reflects the life she lives, but also her impending aging and death. Snow White, on the other hand, holds a glass item which, although she is vivacious and unqualified, represents the lasting nature of death. Before the story ends, the ownership of these glass items are, symbolically, of course, reversed. Snow White, being resurrected and glorified, can enjoy her reflections and life, while her Step-Mother gains death as is represented by Snow White’s sarcophagus.

Further parallels are drawn between the relationship between Snow White and her Step-Mother when observed through a Biblical lens; these observations prove the necessary nature of Snow White and her Step-Mother’s relationship. By analyzing the descriptions of these characters and their actions through a Biblical lens, one easily recognizes the scriptural parallels and their role in cementing the necessary dichotomy of good and evil present within the Brothers Grimm “Snow White”.

Snow White represents, in both name and deed, a representation of the Messianic Christ figure. Throughout the Grimm tale, Snow white is consistently depicted with the utmost purity. The most prominent and obvious example of this blatant purity is her name. Snow White is as innocent as her name is pure. In the same way, according to Christian theology, Isaiah predicts that Christ will be a perfect sacrifice; His sacrifice and blood being necessary to purify His elect. Isaiah notes that Christ washes sinners and makes them “white as snow” (King James Bible, Isaiah 1:18). Snow White is, at her very core, identified as completely pure by naming. How, then, is the Step-Mother described? The Brothers Grimm note that she has a heart “as cold as stone” and that “envy and pride grew like weeds in her heart” (96). The Brothers remind the reader just how wicked she is; although she is fair, her heart is truly cold and dark.

 Following this description of the Step-Mother’s wicked heart, she hires a Huntsman as an assassin. Although he is instructed to kill Snow White, he is ultimately unable. The Brothers explain that the Huntsman thought that “Snow White was so beautiful … and took pity on her” (96). In this situation, Snow White is the innocent that the Step-Mother plans to harm. The Step-Mother’s goal of child sacrifice, when analyzed through Biblical lenses, further proves her wicked heart. When Abraham is given the command to sacrifice his son, Isaac, God, who uses this to test Abraham’s faith, quickly intervenes and bestows a proper sacrifice in the form of a ram. Unlike the wicked Step-Mother, Abraham did not believe that Isaac would die. Either “God will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering” (King James Bible, Genesis 22:8), or, as the writer of Hebrews asserts, “that God was able to raise him up, even from the dead” (King James Bible, Hebrews 11:19); the Step-Mother did not believe these things, but, instead, that the death of Snow White allows for her own self-glorification. In this way, Abraham represent the loving and faithful ideal, akin to the representative Christ in Snow White, while the Step-Mother resembles another Biblical entity: Molech. God, speaking through Moses, issues the command that “thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech” (King James Bible, Leviticus 18:21). Molech was a Canaanite deity who required the sacrifice of children by burning as a means of gaining glory and honor; in this way, the Step-Mother’s bloodlust finds companionship in the Biblical parallel of Molech.

Following the Step-Mother’s failed attempt at self-glorification by means of child sacrifice, she determines to take up the task of killing Snow White for herself. As a means of deception, an arguably clear nod to the works of Satan, she disguises herself as an older, wiser woman. To effectively kill Snow White, she has created three separate tribulations. As each fail, she progresses further and further into her wickedness. She begins, and fails, with an attempt to suffocate Snow White with an overly tightened lace. When this fails, she attempts to use a poisoned comb; this, too, fails. Her final and most effective method is a poisoned apple. This apple, a clear allusion to the fruit that Eve partakes of in Eden’s paradise, kills Snow White for a period, before she is resurrected. What is the significance of these three trials? The importance of the number three from a Biblical stand-point cannot be understated, and, at first glance, one may be inclined to tie the three trials of Snow White to Jesus’ three temptations in the desert. This parallel can be drawn in number only. Aside from the number of temptations, Snow White’s vices do not seem to compare to the grandiose temptations, as described in Matthew, of bread, power, and glory. The last and deadliest of Snow White’s temptations does hold Biblical importance. The Brothers’ audience knew of the original sin and most likely, as did many European Christians in the nineteenth century, held woman responsible for Eve’s transgression. In this way, Snow White’s acceptance of a poisoned apple mirrors Eve’s acceptance of the sin-fruit. Both fruits lead to death; both are given in deception. Snow White serves as a representation of the pre-fall, pure Eve, as well as of Christ. She is truly pure and as white as snow; this contrasts sharply with the wicked and devilish heart of her Step-Mother.

 By contrasting the language and actions surrounding Snow White and the Step-Mother, the Brothers Grimm, through a Biblical lens, further prove the necessary relationship of antagonist-foil shared by these two characters. Without the dichotomy of good versus evil that Snow White and her Step-Mother provide, the tale ceases to become “Snow-White”; the Biblical parallels present throughout the Grimm rendition only aids in the assertion that these characters’ rivalry and foiling natures are essential to the makeup of this tale. While exegetical interpretations and traditions emanating from Biblical study, and misinterpretation, influence every aspect of psychological and sociological thought during the nineteenth century, some traditions, such as the use of darkness or blackness as a representation of evil, are more difficult to explicitly discover in the Scriptures. By moving away from Biblical foundation towards a more cultural and traditional understanding of how evil is understood in the nineteenth century, one can further grasp the consistent and important nature of the representation of good versus evil in the Brothers Grimm “Snow White.”

This idea of good versus evil being explained through a simplified means of dark versus light is not a new development. Darkness is, arguably, one of the greatest fears of humanity. Joshua Levos and Tammy Lowery Zacchilli, in their article “Nyctophobia: From Imagined to Realistic Fears of the Dark,” discover that, “out of the 122 participants … 54% … rated the dark within their top five fears” (105). They also noted, by testing levels of anxiety, that “a significant difference was found” (106) when given nighttime photos after observing daytime photos. This psychological study serves to prove that humans have, to some degree, an innate fear of, or discomfort with, darkness. The Brothers Grimm manage to effectively handle this darkness in a way that highlights the evil nature of the wicked Step-Mother. The opposite is true also; while darkness is where mankind finds its fear, the light is where humanity enjoys some form of tranquility. This tranquility, again, is best observed in how Snow White is named. Her redundant name serves to imply that she is completely white. This whiteness harbors no darkness; she is perfectly comfortable. The wicked Step-Mother, on the other hand, in order to deceive and harm Snow White, further proving her wickedness, must disguise herself through the use of a darkening agent. The Brothers note that, before she sets out to suffocate Snow White with the lacing, the Step-Mother is “staining her face” (98). This staining, although never directly described as dark, most likely darkens her skin, to some extent. Consider more modern iterations of this tale, such as Disney’s Snow White and the Seven Dwarves where the Step-Mother dawns all black and disguises herself as a witch, yet another clear nod to her wickedness. Jena Stephens, through her analysis of Disney films and fairy tale adaptations, notes that, until the release of Disney’s The Princess and the Frog, “anyone portrayed with dark features of any sort was thought to be representative of a villain” (99).  The Brothers do not give such direct or specific details regarding the results of the Step-Mother’s staining, aside from implications of wickedness, but, based on contemporary authors and their understandings of the corollary relationship between darkness and evil, one can assert this staining to be, if not literal, a metaphorical darkening.

Nathaniel Hawthorne, an American author who wrote, although separated by the Atlantic Ocean, alongside the Brothers Grimm during the nineteenth century, presents one of the best cases for the use of the dark or the black as a representation of the evil. Maria Stromberg, in her article “Hawthorne's Black Man: Image of Social Evil,” analyzes the use of the Black Man in Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter as a physical representation of evil. Stromberg notes that “[t]he main image of this evil that threatens a whole community can be found in the mysterious figure of the Black Man” (274). Although much mystery surrounds this man, the villagers all know to avoid him; his given title is no coincidence, either. By giving this mysterious, arguably fictitious, character the title of “Black,” Hawthorne asserts that those things which are dark or black represent evil. By analyzing this small, yet important, use of contemporary literary language, one can more easily note the significance of the Step-Mother’s use of staining as a means of revealing her wicked nature. Her following actions, centering around the murder of Snow White, of course, strengthen this accusation of her malice. As the Step-Mother is more strongly aligned with wickedness and Snow White with goodness, the reader cannot ignore the obvious dichotomy; they serve to foil one another in their antagonism.

While Basile and the Brothers Grimm tell “Snow-White” in its more traditional format, Neil Gaiman, in “Snow, Glass, Apples,” retells this story in a way that swaps the roles of protagonist and antagonist. With Snow White as the wicked aggressor and the Step-Mother as, arguably, the morally upright, their relationship, being completely reversed, still holds true to the themes of foiling presented in the classic iterations. Although Snow White is now wicked, her relationship with her Step-Mother is still one of antagonism. The Step-Mother continues to serve as a foil to Snow White’s character. Gaiman imagines the Step-Mother, no longer needing the epithet “wicked,” as a young, inexperienced wife. She recalls, “I was foolish, and young—eighteen summers had come and gone since I first saw daylight—and I did not do what I would do, now” (108). The Step-Mother, as the newly appointed queen, is perplexed by the idea of how she might deal with an increasingly dangerous issue: Snow White. The Step-Mother recalls the travesties that Snow White is responsible for as the tale’s antagonist, an obvious reversal of roles. She explains that “[Snow White] killed her mother in the birthing” (107) and further implies that Snow White’s father also dies as a result of her wickedness; the Step-Mother notices “a multitude of ancient scars” (108) which, the reader may deduce, appear to be closely related to the scar given to the queen as a result of Snow White’s vampiric desires.

The Step-Mother, in this edition, claims, indirectly, to be the party that is grossly wronged. She continues to back this up with slight nods to Snow White’s corruption of the actual events; these corruptions creating the form of “Snow-White” that Basile and Grimm detail. When detailing the removal of Snow White’s heart by the huntsman the Step-Mother reminds the reader that she has done nothing overtly cruel and that she has been wronged. She notes that “they say that I was fooled; that it was not her heart. That it was the heart of an animal … They are wrong” (108). She continues by addressing, and denying, another common event within the Grimm tale: “and some say (but it is her lie, not mine) that I was given the heart and that I ate it” (108). The Step-Mother further assures the reader of her innocence and continues to insist on the guilt and wickedness of Snow White. As the story progresses, the Step-Mother continues to attempt to thwart and slay Snow White, as is traditionally held within this tale, but the difference lies in the motivation. The Step-Mother fears for the safety of herself and her kingdom; as Snow White continues to slay and feast upon travelers in her vampiric lusts, the Head of the Fair asks the Queen, “do you know what is keeping the travelers from our town? What is happening to the forest people?’ (111). The Queen, proving her positive alignment, assures the Head of the Fair that she “would personally take it upon [herself] to make the forest safe once more” (111) despite her blatant fear of Snow White. The Queen, in following the traditional plotline, is wholly unsuccessful in her attempts to slay Snow White, and, just as the older stories recount, to some extent, the Queen is burned alive. How can the reader be sure that this story really revolves around Snow White and not some horrific vampires? The Step-Mother clearly identifies and labels Snow White when she notes that she “will think of her hair as black as coal, her lips as red as blood, her skin, snow-white (116).

Through the analysis of multiple iterations of the “Snow-White” type, one can easily discern the important relationship that Snow White and the Step-Mother share. Whether this Step-Mother/Queen serves to antagonize and torture Snow White/Lisa, as seen in Basile and the Brothers’ “The Young Slave” and “Snow White” respectively, or to, with good intent, serve as the story’s hero, as in Gaiman’s “Snow, Glass, Apples,” she serves as an opposition to Snow White and, ultimately, as her foil. Through the analysis of three varying takes on this story, the consistency of the Queen/Step-Mother as foil proves her foundational need within the story. Without this Queen figure, whether she be antagonist or protagonist, the “Snow-White” type cannot exist. This use of necessitated foiling of protagonist is also evident in one other fairy tale type: “Little Red Riding Hood.”

Much like the relationship between Snow White and her Step-Mother, the relationship between Little Red Riding Hood and the Big Bad Wolf is founded upon antagonism and foiling. The Wolf, through several modes of temptation and danger, serves as a means by which Little Red Riding Hood may find harm; likewise, the methods and modes by which the Wolf operate function as an effective polarization from the way in which Little Red Riding Hood acts. Through analysis of both characters and their acts, the reader easily discerns the necessary antagonistic and foiling relationship that they hold; without the Wolf to foil Little Red Riding Hood, the story fails to find classification as a “Little Red Riding Hood” type.

            Charles Perrault, in “Little Red Riding Hood,” highlights the obvious dichotomy of good and evil in Little Red Riding Hood and the Big Bad Wolf. He notes that, while Little Red Riding Hood walks to her grandmother’s house, the Wolf “wanted to eat her right there on the spot” (16). As a means of contrasting the protagonist, Perrault notes that Little Red Riding Hood is naïve and a “poor child … who did not know that it was dangerous to stop and listen to wolves” (16). The Wolf goes on to, with intent to consume Little Red Riding Hood, deceive both the Grandmother and her granddaughter. Through his use of deception and trickery, the Wolf serves to foil the upfront and naïve nature of Little Red Riding Hood. It is the young girl’s innocence that allows for the Wolf’s vile nature to flourish. Upon meeting the Wolf, Little Red Riding Hood describes her quest to deliver goods to her Grandmother’s house and then describes the location of her abode. The Wolf, using these directions as inspiration, informs Little Red Riding Hood that he too will visit Grandma. He manipulates the innocent nature of the young girl as a means of filling his belly through deception. Upon arriving at her Grandma’s house, Little Red Riding Hood is confronted with an unfamiliar grandparent; the Wolf, disguised as the Grandma, in what is debated as sexually charged, orders the young girl to strip and enter bed with her. This perverse order proves the savage tendencies of a beast such as the Wolf. Such bestial desires appear as a clear contrast to the innocent and trusting Little Red Riding Hood. What follows her arrival to her Grandma’s house is arguably the most famous set of lines from this story, ones where the Wolf, serving to foil Little Red Riding Hood’s innocent character, deceives her by playing along with her observations. Little Red Riding hood notes, “Grandmother … what big arms you have … what big legs you have … what big ears you have … what big eyes you have … what big teeth you have” (17). Through a physical description of the Wolf, Perrault highlights the foiling relationship these two characters share. If Little Red Riding Hood were not significantly smaller than the Wolf, why would she note the noticeably large size of his body? The Wolf, through the young protagonist’s observations, is described as both much larger, and much more savage than Little Red Riding Hood. By describing his large limbs and teeth, as well as his earlier, sexually charged command, the Wolf contrasts himself from the civil, small Little Red Riding Hood.

            Zohar Shavit, in “The Concept of Childhood and Children’s Folktales: Test Case—‘Little Red Riding Hood,’” outlines the role of childhood and adulthood within fairy tales. Shavit notes that “up until the seventeenth century the child was not perceived as an entity distinct from an adult, and consequently he was not recognized as having special needs” (318). This understanding of how children, and their characters, were perceived allows for a stronger analysis of Little Red Riding Hood and the Wolf. Shavit asserts “up until the seventeenth century,” which, one can assume, means that the seventeenth century is the period in which perceptions of childhood and innocence began to change; this is also the time in which Charles Perrault is writing his fairy tales. Shavit goes on to note that “until the seventeenth century children were an integral part of adult society” (319). Little Red Riding Hood, a fictitious product of the seventeenth century, represents the innocent nature that children, in Perrault’s time, are beginning to be associated with. It is this innocent nature that further polarizes Little Red Riding Hood’s character from the antagonistic Wolf, who seeks to deceive and murder. By understanding the perception, although changing, in Perrault’s era, the reader can better understand the strong opposition present within the characters of the protagonist and antagonist.

            The Brothers Grimm, in “Little Red Cap,” follow an extremely similar path as Perrault. Little Red Riding Hood, in their edition, manages to be deceived and swallowed by the Wolf. The main difference comes in how these stories end. Perrault’s Wolf is victorious in his goal to consume Little Red Riding Hood and Grandma; the Grimm Wolf, however, is not so lucky. The Brothers recount that “once the wolf had satisfied his desires, he … fell asleep” and then “a huntsman happened to be passing by the house” and upon seeing the Wolf exclaimed, “I’ve found you at last, you old sinner” (20). The Brothers do not give any history or background for the Huntsman’s distaste for the Wolf; the reader only knows that the Wolf is an enemy of the Huntsman. It is possible that the Wolf has, in some way, harmed or offended the Huntsman, but the more probable explanation is that the Wolf serves as an Other character. Anne B. Simpson, in her article, “The ‘Tangible Antagonist’: H. G. Wells and the Discourse of Otherness,” notes that the Other is “that which one defines as different from and usually hostile to oneself” (134). This observation stands to explain the reaction the Huntsman has towards the Wolf. The Wolf, as an Other, is naturally hostile towards man, making him an enemy of the Huntsman. Simpson continues to note that, when dealing with the Other, “mankind’s will to perceive the world as fissured into two groups—those with whom we (narrator and, by implication, reader) identify, and those whom we loathe or revile” (135). Simpson’s analysis of the role of the Other on the overall tone of the narrative serves to prove the foiling relationship present between Little Red Riding Hood and the Wolf. By inserting the Huntsman into the tale, the Brothers Grimm, in a break from Perrault’s version, provide a character capable of labeling the Wolf as an Other. This introduction of the character of the Other allows for Little Red Riding hood to be further polarized from the Wolf; as Simpson notes, mankind has a natural tendency to divide itself into two camps: the “us” and the “them.” Little Red Riding Hood, by accepting the Wolf as an Other, further cements the antagonistic and foiling relationship present between them.

            The relationship present between the roles of antagonist and protagonist within Aarne-Thompson type 709 (“Snow-White”) and 333 (“Little Red Riding Hood”) fairy tales serve as much more than simple bases of conflict. These antagonists relationships function in a way that allows for the protagonists to be a complete opposite, or foil, to the antagonist. By analyzing these relationships, the reader fully grasps the foiling nature of the relationship present between the main protagonist and main antagonist from several tales within these two Arne-Thompson types. Through the analysis of Giambattista Basile’s “the Young Slave,” the Brothers Grimm “Snow White,” and Neil Gaiman’s “Snow, Glass, Apples” one easily acknowledges the necessity of the foiling relationship between the “Snow-White” figure and the Queen/Step-Mother/Witch. While Basile and Grimm allow for their “Snow-White” character to be the protagonist, Neil Gaiman presents a reworking of the tale wherein Snow White is established as the antagonist; the end result is the same. When the roles of antagonist and protagonist are reversed, the two characters still maintain their foiling relationship. This creates a consistent foundation upon which “Snow-White” tales must be founded upon. If the “Snow-White” character is not a foil of the Queen/Step-Mother/Witch, then, at least according to previous iterations, the tale fails to be a “Snow-White” type. Likewise, when the “Little Red Riding Hood” type is analyzed, Little Red Riding Hood and the Wolf consistently hold an antagonistic and foiling relationship. Through analyses of Charles Perrault’s “Little Red Riding Hood,” and the Brothers Grimm “Little Red Cap” one easily ascertains the important and foundational role of the relationship between the Wolf and Little Red Riding Hood. The Wolf is savage, both in terms of perversion and physical prowess, large, and deceitful; Little Red Riding Hood, however, is portrayed as naïve, and trusting. She does not seek to deceive, but instead always acts honestly and genuinely. The Brothers Grimm, as a break from Perrault’s, establishes the Wolf as an Other. This classification of the Wolf as Other further separates and polarizes Little Red Riding Hood and the Wolf. Through observations and analyses of these two sets of characters, one easily notes that without the nature of foil between them, the stories cease to be themselves. Without the opposition of the Wolf from Little Red Riding Hood and the Step-Mother from Snow White, these stories would be truly foiled.

Works Cited

Basile, Giambattista. “The Young Slave.” The Classic Fairy Tales, edited by Maria Tatar, W. W. Norton & Company, 2016, pp. 92-95.

Bottigheimer, Ruth B. “The Transformed Queen: A Search for the Origins of Negative Female Archetypes in Grimms’ Fairy Tales.” Amsterdamer Beiträge zur neueren Germanistik, vol. 10, 1980, pp. 1-12. EBSCOhost.

Gaiman, Neil. “Snow, Glass, Apples.” The Classic Fairy Tales, edited Maria Tatar, W. W. Norton & Company, 2016, pp. 106-116.

Gilbert, Sandra M., and Gubar, Susan. “Snow White and Her Wicked Stepmother.” The Classic Fairy Tales, edited by Maria Tatar, W. W. Norton & Company, 1999, pp. 291-297.

Grimm, Brothers. “Little Red Cap.” The Classic Fairy Tales, edited by Maria Tatar, W. W. Norton & Company, 2016, pp. 18-21.

Grimm, Brothers. “Snow White.” The Classic Fairy Tales, edited by Maria Tatar, W. W. Norton & Company, 2016, pp. 95-102.

Levos, Joshua, and Zacchilli, Tammy Lowery. “Nyctophobia: From Imagined to Realistic Fears of the Dark.” Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, vol. 20, no. 2, 2015, pp. 102-110. EBSCOhost.

Maganini, Suzanne. “Foils and Fakes: The Hydra in Giambattista Basile's Dragon-Slayer Tale, ‘Lo mercante.’” Marvels & Tales, vol. 19, no. 2, 2005, pp. 167-196. EBSCOhost.

Perrault, Charles. “Little Red Riding Hood.” The Classic Fairy Tales, edited Maria Tatar, W. W. Norton & Company, 2016, pp. 16-18.

Schaffer, Rachel. “V. I. Talks Back: Sara Paretsky's Unlikable Characters as Foes and Foils.” Clues, vol. 25, no. 2, Winter 2017, pp. 31-42. EBSCOhost.

Shavit, Zohar. “The Concept of Childhood and Children’s Folktales: Test Case—“Little Red Riding Hood.” The Classic Fairy Tales, edited Maria Tatar, W. W. Norton & Company, 1999, pp. 317-332.

Simpson, Anne B. “The ‘Tangible Antagonist’: H.G. Wells and the Discourse of Otherness.” Extrapolation, vol. 31, no. 2, 1990, pp. 135-147. EBSCOhost.

Stephens, Jenna. “Disney’s Darlings: An Analysis of The Princess and the Frog, Tangled, Brave and The Changing Characterization of the Princess Archetype.” Interdisciplinary Humanities, vol. 31, no. 3, Fall 2014, pp. 95-107. EBSCOhost.

Stromberg, Maria. “Hawthorne's Black Man: Image of Social Evil.” The Explicator, vol. 67, no. 4, 2009, pp. 274-276. EBSCOhost.

Tatar, Maria, editor. The Classic Fairy Tales. W. W. Norton & Company, 2016.